The PROSPECT Delphi Study: Prioritising methodological research questions for scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps for health research
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | We’re excited to announce the launch of the new STARDIT Version One at STARDIT.Wikimedia.org.au
All STARDIT reports (and our other material) from Wikispore have been imported to the new site — and any further editing or updating will take place there. The reports on Wikispore will be preserved as archived versions. The new version of this page can be accessed at: https://STARDIT.Wikimedia.org.au/wiki/The_PROSPECT_Delphi_Study:_Prioritising_methodological_research_questions_for_scoping_reviews,_mapping_reviews_and_evidence_and_gap_maps_for_health_research |
Description: To develop a research agenda for scoping reviews, mapping reviews, and evidence and gap maps in health by identifying and prioritising specific research questions related to methodological uncertainties.
Dates
State ongoing
Start 2024-03-18
End 2025-02-28
Form updated 2024-10-02
Report authors
Location
Australia
URL
Aims
To identify and compile the methodological uncertainties for each big picture review related to health research.
To create a priority list for each evidence synthesis of the top ten methodological research questions that need to be addressed regarding big picture reviews related to health research.
Keywords
Methodology
Scoping reviews
Mapping reviews
Evidence and Gap Maps
Evidence Synthesis
Delphi
Category
research
Inputs
funding
$39,460
The University of Adelaide FHMS Building Leaders Grant